Start your weekend right and have a look at our new podcast episodes, webinars and more!
✉️ https://t.co/I4O8mlTIfzhttps://t.co/OGnB3mMG8CRT IIEA @iiea: 7 years on from the #Brexit vote we're continuing to analyse the impact of the UK's withdrawal from the #EU.
Join… https://t.co/cYlxTquavgThe EU is taking charge in regulating data and the digital economy, launching new regulations like the #DMA, #DSA,… https://t.co/jfOuY6kaPNLet's talk about #AI regulations in the #EU!
It is important to understand and enhance the benefits, but also min… https://t.co/OU6PEWlg6j🎧 New global economy podcast episode!
We talk about the US trade policy and America's role in the world economic o… https://t.co/DHHvBdKZ4M
This paper shows that private product standards in EU food and agriculture markets can have significant trade effects. In particular for developing countries and for goods that are perishable or only lightly processed, EU standards can often be trade-inhibiting. However, internationally harmonized EU standards—those that are equivalent to ISO norms—have much weaker trade effects, and in some cases are even trade-promoting. At a policy level, our results highlight the importance of dealing with the trade effects of private standards in major markets, not just mandatory public standards.