Start your weekend right and have a look at our new podcast episodes, webinars and more!
✉️ https://t.co/I4O8mlTIfzhttps://t.co/OGnB3mMG8CRT IIEA @iiea: 7 years on from the #Brexit vote we're continuing to analyse the impact of the UK's withdrawal from the #EU.
Join… https://t.co/cYlxTquavgThe EU is taking charge in regulating data and the digital economy, launching new regulations like the #DMA, #DSA,… https://t.co/jfOuY6kaPNLet's talk about #AI regulations in the #EU!
It is important to understand and enhance the benefits, but also min… https://t.co/OU6PEWlg6j? New global economy podcast episode!
We talk about the US trade policy and America's role in the world economic o… https://t.co/DHHvBdKZ4M
The current crisis in the French wine sector is partly due to the complexity and restrictiveness of the system used to protect geographical indications (GIs). On the demand side, even French consumers are confused by the three-tiered GI system with 450 appellations d’origine contrôlées (AOCs) and 140 vins de pays (VDPs); France’s falling export share suggests that the rest of the world is positively baffled. Meanwhile, GI regulations restrict winemakers’ ability to respond to changes in technology and consumer preferences—inciting some of them to produce VDPs on AOC-protected land, in order to have greater liberty in terms of production methods. Before extending GI protection to other sectors—or strengthening it for wines and spirits—WTO Members should undertake cost-benefit analysis on a national basis, covering both static and dynamic aspects. The French wine experience has much that can inform such a process.