"Today the prime concern is that Europe and other developed countries have become too dependent on China by allowin… https://t.co/zXb4je9VvxListen to our podcast episode in which @FredrikErixon and @s8mb have a conversation on the new wave of #ditigal reg… https://t.co/3Gx9gvbN6S🇨🇳 centralised state procurement and the move towards #monopsony clearly breach basic principles of international e… https://t.co/zDhtEDBV8o🇪🇺🇺🇦Since the war started, we have hosted many events and published substantial analyses about the economic aspects… https://t.co/N843CxdT8o"The new #EU trade policy instruments reinforce the idea that the EU ‘is worth it’ by leveraging the importance of… https://t.co/KVmJZz54UR
Anti-dumping rules are flexible and open to political bias. In the past ten years, EU investigating institutions have been biased towards the imposition of measures. The European Commission claims that all anti-dumping investigations are “rigorously and professionally carried out”. This new paper by Lucy Davis tests the validity of that statement. Davis makes a rigorous examination of the publicly available information from EU anti-dumping cases. She concludes that procedural reform is needed in the investigation process, to raise assessment standards and abate suspicions of anti-dumping protectionism.