E@ECIPE
.@osguinea & @flo_forsthuber analyze #EU imports on more than 9,000 products and concludes that Europe should not b… https://t.co/PyC2cK6W7yRT Matthias Bauer @MatBauerEcon: The declaration would, if adopted, render the EU27 more Chinese: subsidies limited to homegrown firms, restrictive… https://t.co/p3F3qXzmoGÚnete a la charla de Oscar Guinea de @ECIPE con Talento para el Futuro. Hablaremos de la Unión Europea, la Globaliz… https://t.co/hyWaCcpjrbRT David Henig @DavidHenigUK: @TorstenBell True but not unique to the UK or just the last four years. Modern globalisation continues to be poorly… https://t.co/0Ad7Cg017ERT Anabel Gonzalez @_AnabelG: Great discussion! #GTW2020 . Thanks to @Lucian_Cernat @osguinea & @AnaSwanson , and to our audience. My takeaways:… https://t.co/nI39GNf5cX
  • FOLLOW ECIPE
x
Browse

Why did Anti-Dumping Reform Fail?

April 29 2010
Venue: ECIPE, Rue Belliard 4-6, Brussels
Speakers: Dirk De BièvrenJappe Eckhardt
Time: 13:00

Few trade issues are as politically charged as anti-dumping. A few years ago, the European Commission made an effort to reform Europe’s use of trade defence instrument, but the efforts led to little more than a deeper division between users of anti-dumping and sectors damaged by the same policy.

Why did the reform initiative fail? A new ECIPE paper argues that the high degree of political mobilisation by concentrated producer groups and the weaker mobilisation of importers and retailers constituted the main cause for the failure of the EU anti-dumping reform. At this seminar Dirk De Bièvre and Jappe Eckhardt, authors of the study, will present their analyses of the reform process.

Presentations from the seminar:

Location