Start your weekend right and have a look at our new podcast episodes, webinars and more!
✉️ https://t.co/I4O8mlTIfzhttps://t.co/OGnB3mMG8CRT IIEA @iiea: 7 years on from the #Brexit vote we're continuing to analyse the impact of the UK's withdrawal from the #EU.
Join… https://t.co/cYlxTquavgThe EU is taking charge in regulating data and the digital economy, launching new regulations like the #DMA, #DSA,… https://t.co/jfOuY6kaPNLet's talk about #AI regulations in the #EU!
It is important to understand and enhance the benefits, but also min… https://t.co/OU6PEWlg6j🎧 New global economy podcast episode!
We talk about the US trade policy and America's role in the world economic o… https://t.co/DHHvBdKZ4M
The European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries are entering the final phase of negotiation over Economic Partnership Agreements, a set of WTO-compliant preferential trade agreements that will substitute the current non-reciprocal preference scheme. Such agreements would liberalize bilateral trade between the EU and six ACP regional groupings. Such a proposed opening of ACP markets might well provoke trade diversion, will cause serious government revenue losses, and might hamper regional integration. This paper puts forward an alternative path to liberalization, which would minimize these costs while still addressing the WTO constraint and their developmental goals.