Start your weekend right and have a look at our new podcast episodes, webinars and more!
✉️ https://t.co/I4O8mlTIfzhttps://t.co/OGnB3mMG8CRT IIEA @iiea: 7 years on from the #Brexit vote we're continuing to analyse the impact of the UK's withdrawal from the #EU.
Join… https://t.co/cYlxTquavgThe EU is taking charge in regulating data and the digital economy, launching new regulations like the #DMA, #DSA,… https://t.co/jfOuY6kaPNLet's talk about #AI regulations in the #EU!
It is important to understand and enhance the benefits, but also min… https://t.co/OU6PEWlg6j? New global economy podcast episode!
We talk about the US trade policy and America's role in the world economic o… https://t.co/DHHvBdKZ4M
The FDI behavior of a MNE facing a weak institutional environment in the host country is analyzed. Red tape can be strategically reduced by corruption centralization through informal self enforcing implicit contracts that cannot be enforced legally. The MNE trades the improvement of the institutional environment for a reduction in competition by the government. Rent shifting is possible through an incentive compatible FDI scheme which is robust to repeated interactions in a dynamic relationship when the corruption is stable. Improvement in bureaucratic behavior can benefit the country through an increase of the consumer surplus due to a fall of the marginal cost of the MNE. Centralization of corruption appears thus as a first step in the route of economic growth of countries with weak institutions.