Database
Restrictions on data
UNITED STATES
Since 2018
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018
While in the United States there is no national law on data privacy, the state of California has passed in 2018 a privacy law that will apply to all firms established in the state. California's Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 demands that firms give consumers the opportunity to learn the categories of personal information that they collect, sell, or disclose about them, and to whom information is sold or disclosed. The Act also gives consumers right to prevent businesses from selling or disclosing their personal information. Individuals must therefore be informed that their information may be sold, and that they have a "right to opt out."
Coverage Horizontal
Sources
- https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/17-0039%20%28Consumer%20Privacy%20V2%29.pdf
- https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/Title%20and%20Summary%20%2817-0039%29_0.pdf
- https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/28/17509720/california-consumer-privacy-act-legislation-law-vote
- https://www.caprivacy.org/facts
Restrictions on data
UNITED STATES
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
There are few limits on the transfer of personal data outside the US. Several states have enacted laws that limit or discourage state agencies or state contractors from outsourcing data processing beyond US borders, but these laws are typically limited to state government agencies and private companies that contract to perform services for or provide goods to state agencies.
Coverage Horizontal
Restrictions on data
UNITED STATES
Since 1999
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Network Security Agreements
It is reported that foreign communications infrastructure providers have been asked to sign Network Security Agreements (NSAs) in order to operate in the US. These agreements ensure that U.S. government agencies have the ability to access communications data when legally requested.
The agreements reported range in date from 1999 to 2011 and involve a rotating group of government agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DoJ), Department of Defense (DoD) and sometimes the Department of the Treasury.
According to the Washington Post, the agreements require companies to maintain what amounts to an “internal corporate cell of American citizens with government clearances” ensuring that “when U.S. government agencies seek access to the massive amounts of data flowing through their networks, the companies have systems in place to provide it securely.”
Moreover, the agreements impose local storage requirements for certain customers data as well as minimum periods of data retention for data such as billing records and access logs.
The agreements reported range in date from 1999 to 2011 and involve a rotating group of government agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DoJ), Department of Defense (DoD) and sometimes the Department of the Treasury.
According to the Washington Post, the agreements require companies to maintain what amounts to an “internal corporate cell of American citizens with government clearances” ensuring that “when U.S. government agencies seek access to the massive amounts of data flowing through their networks, the companies have systems in place to provide it securely.”
Moreover, the agreements impose local storage requirements for certain customers data as well as minimum periods of data retention for data such as billing records and access logs.
Coverage Telecommunication sector
Sources
Restrictions on data
TURKEY
Since November 2008
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Electronic Communications Act
The transfer of traffic and location data abroad is permitted with the data subjects' explicit consent.
Coverage Electronic communications sector
Restrictions on data
TURKEY
Since April 2016
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Data Protection Law No. 6698
The legislation stipulates that data cannot be processed or transferred abroad without the individual's explicit consent. Consent will not be required if the transfer is necessary to exercise a right or is required by law, and either:
- Sufficient protection exists in the transferee country, or
- if the data controller gives a written security undertaking and Turkey’s Data Protection Board grants permission.
- Sufficient protection exists in the transferee country, or
- if the data controller gives a written security undertaking and Turkey’s Data Protection Board grants permission.
Coverage Horizontal
Restrictions on data
TURKEY
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Restrictions on data
TURKEY
Amended in March 2015
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Payment Services and Electronic Money Institutions Law No. 6493
Article 23 of Law No. 6493 requires that "the system operator, payment institution and electronic money institution shall be required to keep all the documents and records related to the matters within the scope of this Law for at least ten years within the country, in a secure and accessible manner". The article also specifies that "the information systems and their substitutes, which are used by system operator to carry out its activities shall also be kept within the country".
Coverage E-money institutions and payment services providers
Sources
- http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/3deb8069-ce8d-4ba7-a31d-e075259aa60a/6493_eng.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE3deb8069-ce8d-4ba7-a31d-e075259aa60a
- http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Services/Tax/International-Tax/Alert--Turkey-enacts-legislation-regarding-new-E-money-and-payment-services
- http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/cf15ee9a-4576-4978-ab7f-b23b398cb597/11.03.15-atkinson-testimony.pdf
Restrictions on data
SOUTH AFRICA
Since April 2014
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013
Consent is needed for the data transfer to third countries. Otherwise, the transfer can happen if:
- the third party is subject to a law, binding corporate rules or binding agreement that provide for an adequate level of protection;
- the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract between the data subject and the responsible party, or
- the transfer is necessary for the implementation of pre-contractual measures taken in response to the data subject's request.
- the third party is subject to a law, binding corporate rules or binding agreement that provide for an adequate level of protection;
- the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract between the data subject and the responsible party, or
- the transfer is necessary for the implementation of pre-contractual measures taken in response to the data subject's request.
Coverage Horizontal
Restrictions on data
RUSSIA
Since January 2007
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Federal Law no. 152-FZ “On Personal Data” (OPD-Law) of July 2006
According to the Federal Law no. 152-FZ “On Personal Data” (OPD-Law) the transfer of data outside Russia does not require additional consent from the data subject only if the jurisdiction that the personal data is transferred to ensures adequate protection of personal data. Those jurisditctions are the parties to the Convention 108 and other countries approved by the Russian Federal Service for Supervision in the sphere of Telecom, Information Technologies and Mass Communications (Roskomnadzor). Roskomnadzor's official list of countries includes Australia, Argentina, Canada, Israel, Mexico and New Zealand.
Coverage Horizontal
Restrictions on data
RUSSIA
Since July 2016
Since July 2018
Since July 2018
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Federal Law No. 374 on Amending the Federal Law "on Counterterrorism and Select Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation Concerning the Creation of Additional Measures Aimed at Countering Terrorism and Protecting Public Safety"
Federal Law No 374-FZ, signed in July 2016, requires local storage of information confirming the fact of receipt, transmission, delivery and/or processing of voice data, text messages, pictures, sounds, video or other communications (i.e., metadata reflecting these communications). The storage period is of three years (with respect to telecom providers) or one year (with respect to ISPs and message exchange services). In addition, local storage for a period of six months is required for the content of communications, including voice data, text messages, pictures, sounds, video or other communications. While the first requirement entered into force in July 2016, the second requirement came into force starting from July 2018.
Coverage Telecommunication sector, ISPs and message exchange services
Restrictions on data
RUSSIA
Since August 2014
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Government Decree №758 of 31 July 2014 and №801 from 12 August 2014
The Russian Government has given instructions to require public Wi-Fi user identification. The government decrees require that:
- ISPs should identify Internet users, by means of identity documents (such as passport);
- ISPs should identify terminal equipment by determining the unique hardware identifier of the data network;
- all legal entities in Russia are required to provide ISPs monthly with the list of the individuals that connected to the Internet using their network.
The data should be stored locally for a period of at least six months.
Later in 2015, the authorities have proposed the following levels of fines for non-compliance:
- 5,000-50,000 rubles (approx. 60-140 USD) for individual entrepreneurs; and
- 100,000-200,000 rubles (approx. 1,400-2,600 USD) for legal entities.
The fines would be higher for repeating offenders.
- ISPs should identify Internet users, by means of identity documents (such as passport);
- ISPs should identify terminal equipment by determining the unique hardware identifier of the data network;
- all legal entities in Russia are required to provide ISPs monthly with the list of the individuals that connected to the Internet using their network.
The data should be stored locally for a period of at least six months.
Later in 2015, the authorities have proposed the following levels of fines for non-compliance:
- 5,000-50,000 rubles (approx. 60-140 USD) for individual entrepreneurs; and
- 100,000-200,000 rubles (approx. 1,400-2,600 USD) for legal entities.
The fines would be higher for repeating offenders.
Coverage ISPs providing public Wi-Fi
Sources
- http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russia-bans-anonymous-public-wi-fi/504855.html
- https://globalvoicesonline.org/2014/08/07/public-wifi-internet-id-passport-russia/
- http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/page/wilmap-russia
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/08/us-russia-internet-idUSKBN0G81RV20140808
http://www.minsvyaz.ru/ru/events/33687/
Restrictions on data
RUSSIA
From January 2015 until July 2017.
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
New provisions in the Federal law on information, information technologies and protection of information (often referred to as Blogger’s law)
Federal Law No. 276-FZ "On Amendments to the Federal Law "On Data, Information Technologies and Data Security"
Federal Law No. 276-FZ "On Amendments to the Federal Law "On Data, Information Technologies and Data Security"
The “Blogger’s law” was repealed in in July 2017 by the Federal Law No. 276-FZ. It required "organizers of information distribution in the Internet" (it is not clear which operators fall under this definition) to store on Russian territory information on facts of receiving, transfer, delivery and/or processing of voice information, texts, images, sounds and other electronic messages and information about users during six months from the end of these actions.
Blogs with more than 3,000 readers were required to register as "organizers of information distribution" and were therefore subject to this requirement. Platforms that did not comply with these requirements upon a second notice faced a fine of 500,000 rubles and could be blocked in Russia by Roscomnadzor. Russian services such as VKontakte, Yandex and Mail.Ru registered their activities.
Blogs with more than 3,000 readers were required to register as "organizers of information distribution" and were therefore subject to this requirement. Platforms that did not comply with these requirements upon a second notice faced a fine of 500,000 rubles and could be blocked in Russia by Roscomnadzor. Russian services such as VKontakte, Yandex and Mail.Ru registered their activities.
Coverage "Organizers of information distribution in the Internet"
Restrictions on data
RUSSIA
Since June 2011, amended in October 2014
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Federal Law No. 161-FZ “On the National Payment System” dated June 2011 (the NPS Law) as amended in October 2014 by the Federal Law No. 319-FZ “On Amendments to the Federal Law on the National Payment System and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”
The amendments to the National Payment System Law require international payment cards to be processed locally. The law requires international payment systems to transfer their processing capabilities with respect to Russian domestic operations to the local state-owned operator (National Payment Card System) by 31 March 2015.
The amendments are reported to be a response to the international political sanctions which prohibited certain international payment systems (e.g., Visa and MasterCard) from servicing payments on cards issued by sanctioned Russian banks.
The amendments are reported to be a response to the international political sanctions which prohibited certain international payment systems (e.g., Visa and MasterCard) from servicing payments on cards issued by sanctioned Russian banks.
Coverage International payment systems
Restrictions on data
RUSSIA
Since September 2015
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Federal Law no. 152-FZ “On Personal Data” (OPD-Law) as amended in July 2014 by Federal Law No. 242-FZ “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation for Clarification of Personal Data Processing in Information and Telecommunications Networks”
Russian data protection has been covered since 27 July 2006 by Federal Law no. 152-FZ, also known as the OPD-law (“On Personal Data”). In July 2014, the law was amended by the Federal Law No. 242-FZ to include a clear data localisation requirement. Article 18 §5 requires data operators to ensure that the recording, systematisation, accumulation, storage, update/amendment and retrieval of personal data of the citizens of the Russian Federation is made using databases located in the Russian Federation. This amendment entered into force on 1 September 2015.
It is not clear how restrictive the data localisation requirement is, but it appears that the OPD-Law does not prohibit accessing the servers from abroad and does not impose any special restriction on cross-border data transfers or duplication of personal data.
Online websites that violate the prohibition could be placed on the Roscomnadzor's blacklist of websites.
It is not clear how restrictive the data localisation requirement is, but it appears that the OPD-Law does not prohibit accessing the servers from abroad and does not impose any special restriction on cross-border data transfers or duplication of personal data.
Online websites that violate the prohibition could be placed on the Roscomnadzor's blacklist of websites.
Coverage Horizontal
Sources
- http://www.linklaters.com/Insights/Publication1403Newsletter/TMT-News-8-December-2014/Pages/Russia-New-data-localisation-law.aspx#sthash.HzIuQIZq.dpuf
- http://privacylaw.proskauer.com/2015/08/articles/international/a-primer-on-russias-new-data-localization-law/
- http://us.practicallaw.com/2-502-2227#a445355
- Anupam Chander et Uyên P. Lê, 2015, Data Nationalism, Emory Law Review, 64, 677, p. 678-739. Available at http://law.emory.edu/elj/content/volume-64/issue-3/articles/data-nationalism.html
Restrictions on data
PAKISTAN
Since 2005
Chapter Data policies |
Sub-chapter Restrictions on cross-border data flows
Prohibition of data transfer
Although the transfer of data to third parties is not specifically regulated under the laws of Pakistan, data cannot be transferred to a country which is not recognized by Pakistan.
Currently, the list of countries not recognized by Pakistan include: Israel, Taiwan, Kosovo, Somaliland, Nagorno-Karabakh, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Northern Cyprus, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, South Ossetia and Armenia. This list may change from time to time.
Furthermore, data can only be transferred to India if such a transfer can be justified by the transferor.
Currently, the list of countries not recognized by Pakistan include: Israel, Taiwan, Kosovo, Somaliland, Nagorno-Karabakh, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Northern Cyprus, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, South Ossetia and Armenia. This list may change from time to time.
Furthermore, data can only be transferred to India if such a transfer can be justified by the transferor.
Coverage Horizontal