Is China closing itself? How are new business restrictions causing friction? What are the secrets for success in Ch… https://t.co/uwgBChS443Our new podcast is out! Just in time for the weekend 😎
Learn more about how #competition policy can push innovatio… https://t.co/jszPz3jWtm🚀✨ “Your eyes can deceive you; don’t trust them,” - Obi-Wan Kenobi
👀 At the end of 2021, fear of #COVID19 was te… https://t.co/9K3YH91jj3🔎 Learn more about our newly launched project on intellectual property and trade
📈 Intellectual property can bo… https://t.co/fdTjfKJPY3🇪🇺🇬🇧 "In short, economic geography and power politics suggest the UK will over time find a better relationship with… https://t.co/jJVOgLsWhu
As the Doha negotiations are at a dead end, Valentin Zahrnt addresses some fundamental questions about the future direction of WTO disciplines in agriculture. First, which agricultural policy instruments should be permitted or prohibited by WTO disciplines so as to best account for the manifold effects of agriculture on societies’ welfare? Second, how should inefficient agricultural policies be treated as long as their removal is politically infeasible? And third, how can the WTO facilitate agricultural policy reform beyond establishing maximum thresholds for distorting policies? The author argues for moving from the current ‘boxes’ of domestic subsidies to a classification system that is more responsive to the differing degree of legitimacy of agricultural policy instruments. He also proposes to introduce ‘good governance’ norms that guide members’ decision-making in agriculture towards policies that are at the same time domestically efficient and internationally responsible.